I made this a support ticket in case there's already some way to do this that i'm not thinking of; if not, i'll make this an Idea, or just a Ticket if there's no objection.
well, not link, of course! I think it should be raw, because that's how it should be stored. I think this is a good idea but not ready for a ticket.
--Ethan McCutchen.....Sun Apr 25 21:52:20 -0700 2010
I made this an idea. Would the ticket be change data of file and image cards to URL? And what's not ready to ticket about it?
--John Abbe.....Mon Apr 26 12:52:32 -0700 2010
Currently, image content is |img src="URL"| and files have |a href="URL"|
--John Abbe.....Mon Apr 26 15:14:25 -0700 2010
Lew, I like this idea -- representing images and files in the database with urls. It seems to me more like what the raw content should be. Why was it that you didn't like this plan?
Hmm, I did actually just realize an issue. What if we want a url to a medium-sized image or an icon? Raw will always return the same thing. Hmmm, maybe we're going to need a view after all.
--Ethan McCutchen.....Mon May 03 13:03:13 -0700 2010