Migrating may be tricky, so the earlier this is done the better. But it should be done with plenty of warning, i.e.:
Ultimately, Wagneers would like to be able to specify both a maximum number of cards for a search, and how many to return at a time. Currently, "limit" does the latter but people often expect it to mean the former.
I don't really like the term "paging", as it seems more like a yes/no setting, and it might be narrower than what we want. other ideas:
If we want to be done with this by Wagn 2.0, probably a good idea to do this first part pretty soon.
--John Abbe.....Mon Mar 07 16:06:56 -0800 2011
2.0 is pretty stacked. any reason to tackle this?
--Ethan McCutchen.....Mon Mar 07 16:38:17 -0800 2011
No more than many other things, imho. Just wanted to ping it.
--John Abbe.....Mon Mar 07 16:59:46 -0800 2011
the first part could be quick if we could settle the term. I think my favorite so far is "batch"
--Ethan McCutchen.....Fri May 27 21:13:26 -0700 2011