close fullscreen

Woud fit to be able to use image card for background image at the same time.

I just want to note that it's ok (and often preferable) if the layout is an html card (or just a basic card with some html classes in it) and accomplishes some things that we currently do via layout files. The only logic that's currently in the logo, for example, is about using text if there's no image, but since we now default with an image, and the layout will be fully configurable, we can drop that. So I'm removing a bunch of the logo / sidebar stuff from the solution.

  --Ethan McCutchen.....Thu Sep 17 14:57:33 -0700 2009

also, the help/error messages seen above cards are generally handled on a different layer from the layout.

  --Ethan McCutchen.....Thu Sep 17 15:26:36 -0700 2009

a crude version is up for testing on dwagn. lots of changes still in the works.

  --Lewis Hoffman.....Fri Sep 18 08:56:25 -0700 2009

Cool, basically looks great so far!

 

How do these double-star cards work? They don't show up as either real or virtual.

 

  • Want editable - **head (opens *many* possibilities) - workaround would be to have the head /head tags in the HTML, as on http://test.dwagn.org/wagn/Default_Layout (ah, but i see that those tags are wanted in **head so as to be able to not have a head tag at all)
  • Nice to have: **top_menu, **account_links, **bottom_menu, **foot
  • Okay uneditable - **logo, **alerts

 

I see _main, so i tagged add reference syntax for main card of page with Wagn 1.2

  --John Abbe.....Thu Sep 24 18:27:51 -0700 2009

I'm editing the solution to match what i'm seeing - double-stars, underscores instead of spaces, added **logo

  --John Abbe.....Thu Sep 24 18:29:17 -0700 2009

I flipped the main and sidebar columns on test. Trivial - http://test.dwagn.org/wagn/*layout and http://test.dwagn.org/wagn/*css

  --John Abbe.....Fri Sep 25 19:19:13 -0700 2009

we want to change what we build to match the solution, not the solution to match the spike. changed all that back :)

  --Ethan McCutchen.....Wed Sep 30 10:28:06 -0700 2009

John, there will be no double star cards, and they won't work like they do now (a hack on inclusions). They'll be virtual cards.

 

Re editability: we should be able to add things to head, but not to remove things that will break everything.

  --Ethan McCutchen.....Wed Sep 30 10:31:06 -0700 2009

Have added another major round of changes: edits to layout itself, having *layout be a pointer referring to Html layout card, and using virtual cards in the layout.

  --Lewis Hoffman.....Wed Oct 07 14:25:08 -0700 2009

Hey Lew, I have a question about this one:

 

Should we move context="main" into a new div that gets created when you render

Woud fit to be able to [[use image card for background image]] at the same time.

I just want to note that it's ok (and often preferable) if the layout is an html card (or just a basic card with some html classes in it) and accomplishes some things that we currently do via layout files. The only logic that's currently in the logo, for example, is about using text if there's no image, but since we now default with an image, and the layout will be fully configurable, we can drop that. So I'm removing a bunch of the logo / sidebar stuff from the solution.

  --[[Ethan McCutchen]].....Thu Sep 17 14:57:33 -0700 2009

also, the help/error messages seen above cards are generally handled on a different layer from the layout.

  --[[Ethan McCutchen]].....Thu Sep 17 15:26:36 -0700 2009

a crude version is up for testing on dwagn. lots of changes still in the works.

  --[[Lewis Hoffman]].....Fri Sep 18 08:56:25 -0700 2009

Cool, basically looks great so far!

 

How do these double-star cards work? They don't show up as either real or virtual.

 

  • Want editable - **head (opens *many* possibilities) - workaround would be to have the head /head tags in the HTML, as on http://test.dwagn.org/wagn/Default_Layout (ah, but i see that those tags are wanted in **head so as to be able to not have a head tag at all)
  • Nice to have: **top_menu, **account_links, **bottom_menu, **foot
  • Okay uneditable - **logo, **alerts

 

I see _main, so i tagged [[add reference syntax for main card of page]] with Wagn 1.2

  --[[John Abbe]].....Thu Sep 24 18:27:51 -0700 2009

I'm editing the solution to match what i'm seeing - double-stars, underscores instead of spaces, added **logo

  --[[John Abbe]].....Thu Sep 24 18:29:17 -0700 2009

I flipped the main and sidebar columns on test. Trivial - http://test.dwagn.org/wagn/*layout and http://test.dwagn.org/wagn/*css

  --[[John Abbe]].....Fri Sep 25 19:19:13 -0700 2009

we want to change what we build to match the solution, not the solution to match the spike. changed all that back :)

  --[[Ethan McCutchen]].....Wed Sep 30 10:28:06 -0700 2009

John, there will be no double star cards, and they won't work like they do now (a hack on inclusions). They'll be virtual cards.

 

Re editability: we should be able to add things to head, but not to remove things that will break everything.

  --[[Ethan McCutchen]].....Wed Sep 30 10:31:06 -0700 2009

Have added another major round of changes: edits to layout itself, having *layout be a pointer referring to Html layout card, and using virtual cards in the layout.

  --[[Lewis Hoffman]].....Wed Oct 07 14:25:08 -0700 2009

Hey Lew, I have a question about this one:

 

Should we move context="main" into a new div that gets created when you render {{_main}}. That seems like the relevant place to have the "main" context, and it removes a potentially confusing way to break things (if you forget that in a layout). I'm thinking if we want to do this we might want to fix it before the release -- would be harder to do later after everyone had already done their thing, right?

  --[[Ethan McCutchen]].....Thu Oct 15 15:55:23 -0700 2009

. That seems like the relevant place to have the "main" context, and it removes a potentially confusing way to break things (if you forget that in a layout). I'm thinking if we want to do this we might want to fix it before the release -- would be harder to do later after everyone had already done their thing, right?

  --Ethan McCutchen.....Thu Oct 15 15:55:23 -0700 2009