part of WQL not being respected+discussion

Don't know. I'd have to look at the SQL generated to figure this out.  Glad to have a good broken example.

But it looks to me like this works: http://grouppatternlanguage.org/wagn/Ethan_McCutchen+test_search

Thx for the WQL. Wagn might have to steal Perl's slogan - "There's more than one way to do it." :-)

I've updated the live search so it works, and moved the broken WQL to another card (and updated the link above to point to the new card).

  --John Abbe.....Thu Jan 20 10:49:59 -0800 2011

fix broken WQL combining plus and or

  --John Abbe.....Thu Jan 20 10:54:18 -0800 2011