Escaping for links and inclusion+discussion
I see value in being able to make text monospaced (again, for documentation)
--John Abbe.....Mon Mar 10 15:15:25 PDT 2008
The inclusion and the links provide slightly different challenges. If, for any given card, the double ['s make it past initial rendering and into the cache, your work on links is done. On the other hand, if your double {'s make it past initial rendering, then the inclusions will still get rendered. So I think ['s should be handled pre-cache, and {'s should be handled post.
--Ethan McCutchen.....Tue Sep 16 13:11:01 -0700 2008
would like to deprecate the star-slash mockup. Maybe there's a tinymce monospace option? Doesn't seem wagny to do this with markup.
--Ethan McCutchen.....Wed Dec 10 15:32:30 -0800 2008
Current test code works on Wagn-links and inclusions, but not on URLs - see http://new.wagn.org/wagn/DeleteMe+new
--John Abbe.....Wed Mar 25 16:42:33 -0700 2009
Note re monospace added to Google doc.
--John Abbe.....Wed Mar 25 17:23:37 -0700 2009
Also, just noticed that the link and inclusion are monospaced - i'd be inclined to make them regular text (requiring explicit whatever-we-come-up-with to monospace)
--John Abbe.....Wed Mar 25 17:41:38 -0700 2009
ok, I took away the monospace.
--Ethan McCutchen.....Wed Mar 25 20:39:24 -0700 2009
Cool re monospace. Escaping of URLs (with or without http:// ) still not working - see http://new.wagn.org/wagn/DeleteMe+new
--John Abbe.....Thu Mar 26 02:33:52 -0700 2009
oh, gotcha. yeah, I don't think I want to attempt that right now. can you make a separate ticket for that one? seems low pri to me.
--Ethan McCutchen.....Thu Mar 26 10:18:24 -0700 2009
Escaping for plain links
--John Abbe.....Thu Mar 26 11:34:14 -0700 2009
Places to document (also see +example above):
markup
nesting
--John Abbe.....Thu Mar 26 11:47:23 -0700 2009