Ingredient lists in a recipe+discussion

The closest i've gotten to this as things are is with a Pointer whose items defaults to a cardtype (see http://grouppatternlanguage.org/wagn/Visual+*plus_cards ), which can then have two or more inclusions in it.

But for this user story, that would mean giving a unique name to each ingredient/quantity pair in each recipe. Not user-friendly.

Is a convincing example of why we want to allow cards without names?

I guess the Wagn-y workaround is to use autonaming and Wagneer the name to not show up?

  --John Abbe.....Sat Apr 07 18:58:24 +0000 2012