add a way to change set with new easy formatting

Support Ticket



 The new easy access to form element settings (part of the work to improve form creation experience) defaults to type+right (eg 'All "+scope" cards on "Bud" cards') - woud be nice to have an easy way to shift to eg "All +scope cards".*type+*content



interesting.  Seems like what we want is to go to something like the rule interface, but just for *content

I can imagine wanting this on other settings as well, especially on a site like TRN's where there are multiple types with the same plus cards in their forms (Bud, Flower, Fruit).

  --John Abbe.....2013-03-10 02:56:08 +0000

don't get it. we were talking about linking from the current *content rule to a place where you can tweak the sets for that rule. If you're dealing with other settings, don't you just click on "rules"?

  --Ethan McCutchen.....2013-03-10 06:11:18 +0000

If you're on Bud+*type+*content and click on "+Scope" you get an interface to change the settings for Bud+Scope+*type_plus_right but once you're there you may realize that what you really want is to edit the settings for Scope+*right. What I was suggesting was adding a way to shift to that set. I now realize that this is already possible if you go in and edit a setting first. This is not as discoverable as it could be, but anyway not about the new easy formatting. Sorry about the confusion.

  --John Abbe.....2013-03-10 21:30:40 +0000

you can already select the set via that interface. It's just named after the narrowest set.

  --Ethan McCutchen.....2013-03-10 21:35:49 +0000

oh, you said that. actually, might be curse of knowledge. most would explore the interface before they know enough to be confused :)

  --Ethan McCutchen.....2013-03-10 21:37:07 +0000

Yeah, that's what I realized. I do think it could be easier, but that's certainly way unurgent.

  --John Abbe.....2013-03-10 21:37:58 +0000

IMHO it would be an improvement to add a way to change to related sets from list of a set's rules (without having to edit a specific rule first).

  --John Abbe.....2013-03-10 21:39:44 +0000

hmm, that sounds much more confusing to me.

  --Ethan McCutchen.....2013-03-10 21:47:45 +0000

maybe it's a labeling issue. Note that this view is showing all the rules that apply, *even if the rules are attached to a more general set*. So the label may read something like "all +whatever cards on +thistype", but in practice what is being shown is "all rules that will apply here". If we were to add interface to show a narrower set, it would then be showing "all rules that apply here except for some", which is why I think it's way more confusing.

  --Ethan McCutchen.....2013-03-11 02:30:45 +0000

not sure there's a good change idea here yet. I'm going to mark it "answered", but feel free to change that if desired.

--Ethan McCutchen.....2013-09-12 20:03:41 +0000