apply type in inclusions when multi-editing+discussion

Are there other situations in which the inclusion type-setting won't be applied that we might want it to?

---

keep specifiable relative content for plus cards in mind at least while coding this

  --John Abbe.....Tue Apr 28 13:34:50 -0700 2009

---

very simple to fix. no real new structure.

  --Ethan McCutchen.....Thu Apr 30 11:05:34 -0700 2009

---

Was unsure about prioritizing inclusion syntax over rform, but makes sense. rform specifies default in all cases, inclusion syntax overrides it in certain cases.

  --John Abbe.....Thu Apr 30 11:24:22 -0700 2009

---

Want to document this feature in general in structure and nesting.

  --John Abbe.....Thu Apr 30 11:25:26 -0700 2009