get started
concepts
features
syntax
intro
mods
REST API
github
blueprints
tickets
support
ideas
contact
license
specifying type: in inclusion syntax works fine in regular inclusions. In hard-templated case the correct editor is displayed in initial form, but the saved plus cards are all saved as basic.
how hard is this? If it's a 1-pointer, maybe we try to sneak it in?
I think this was a duplicate ticket of fix type specifications in inclusions. Eerily similar name even... Fixed in Wagn 1.4
--Ethan McCutchen.....Tue May 04 14:51:13 -0700 2010