having seperate search navbox cards

Support Ticket

having seperate search navbox cards+status
having seperate search navbox cards+tags
 

having seperate search navbox cards+issues

My wagn site currently uses two layouts, I'd like to give each layout its own search parameters. I created a new search card based on the *search card and while I have the WQL syntax correct for the searches I'd like to perform, I can't see how to update *navbox with the new search card. How can I point *navbox to the search card I'd like to be using at any given time?

http://wiki.calipercorp.com and http://wiki.calipercorp.com/Taleo_Business_Edition_Caliper_Deployment_Guide have different layouts with different top bars, but these need separate search bars.

 

Sounds like it would require code, as far as I know.

 

One general solution would be for us to add a setting that specifies a *search. Another method would be for us to add a "search" directive in inclusion syntax, which would only be relevant when including *navbox. So the custom layout for a custom search section would use {{*navbox|search:*customsearch}} rather than {{*navbox}} (which would default to *search). --John Abbe


yes, the connection is currently hard coded. There's very little code involved; it would just be a couple of hours work or less for someone who knows the code.

 

fwiw, the second (inclusion-based) solution makes a lot more sense to me; any given setting card would seem to have problems. There is a "wild" directive that can be used for narrow cases like this.

  --Ethan McCutchen.....Thu Jun 21 19:29:06 +0000 2012


You mean it would be {{*navbox|wild:*customsearch}} , and wild has context-sensitive meaning for cases narrow enough that you'd never be likely to have two different uses on the same set? Is this to avoid having "too many" directives?

  --John Abbe.....Thu Jun 21 22:45:55 +0000 2012


that's pretty much the syntax, yes (except customsearch shouldn't have a "*"). for now the inclusion syntax is a reserved namespace. "wild" lets people pass variables through but doesn't open up new syntax creation (yet).

  --Ethan McCutchen.....Thu Jun 21 22:51:24 +0000 2012